View Full Version : ICC Women's World Cup 2013
http://p.imgci.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/153800/153861.jpg
http://www.espncricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/153900/153944.jpg
Diana Edulji, a former India captain and one of the pioneering woman cricketers from the country, represented India between 1976 and 1993. Years after her retirement, she and Shanta Rangaswamy are among the most widely known names in Indian women's cricket. Edulji has served on the BCCI's women's committee and has also been manager of the Indian women's team in 2009. She currently works for Indian Railways, which has played a very important role in supporting women's cricket over the last three decades. Edulji spoke to ESPNcricinfo on the eve of the 2013 ICC Women's World Cup.
Diana Edulji: "The selectors get the maximum [money in Indian Women's cricket], then come the match referees and then the players" © Andy Campbell/UTPMEDIA
Enlarge
Related Links
News : Women need more Tests - Mithali
News : Edulji slams 'discriminatory' BCCI, says women's game dying
Players/Officials: Diana Edulji | Jhulan Goswami | Mithali Raj
Teams: India | India Women
What has actually changed on the ground after the BCCI has come into women's cricket?
Initially everybody was happy with the merger in 2006, when we requested Mr Sharad Pawar, who was then the president of the board. Earlier the women's association did not have funds, the players did not have good facilities. [After the merger], domestic players started getting more money, they travelled better, stayed in good hotels and got good grounds to play on. But I think that was just the beginning, and that was it. It was a dream, and then the bubble burst. I am not too happy with the situation at the moment.
The BCCI is running women's cricket because they have to run it, since the ICC is now running both men's and women's cricket.
I would say it is an insult to women's cricket to be treated this way. There is no cricket. Domestic cricket comprises only one T20 tournament and one 50-over tournament. There are no longer-format matches and no Test matches. I cannot understand why we cannot play one Test match at least during a bilateral series. If Australia and England can play the Ashes, why can't India play Tests?
When I was on the [women's] committee, I had an argument with Mr [Shashank] Manohar and Mr Srinivasan. I asked them why we couldn't play the longer version. When we went to England in 2006, we won a Test series.
The T20 mindset, where you go and hit from the first ball, is not going to help. There is a little bit [of long-form cricket] at Under-19 level, nothing at the Under-16 level. So how is the game going to develop?
The team can have one or two Tests. You don't have to have seven ODIs or five T20s for the women. You bifurcate the full series, see how many days a team can play, and then work out a schedule. It is not necessary to play only 50-over or 20-over cricket.
Compared to the times you grew up in, what incentive does a young girl have to play the game today in India?
When we started playing, we had nothing. We were paying from our pocket. When I went to the World Cup in 1982, each girl had to pay Rs 10,000 to go to New Zealand. We put it in the papers, and Mr Antulay, the Maharashtra chief minister, came to the rescue of the four Maharashtrian players: myself, Vrinda Bhagat, Anjali [Pendharkar] and Shubhangi [Kulkarni]. He signed a cheque and told us, "You all will go."
There was a tin shed here [at the Western Railways ground in Mahalaxmi, Mumbai] where there is now a hostel. The Indian team have slept there on tables. They have travelled unreserved in a train from Mumbai to Delhi. Compared to that, what these girls [points to the Western Railways side practising nearby] have got at the moment is absolutely five-star treatment.
But where is the game? Where is the dedication? What we played was total, absolute enjoyment. Even my own team here are not enjoying the game. They are playing because they have got jobs [with Railways] and they are satisfied.
I have been telling the girls that they must not be satisfied with the breadcrumbs thrown at them. Jhulan [Goswami], Mithali [Raj], nobody can throw them out of the team. They have got their backing with their performances. If they demand something, it has to be heard. But they are satisfied.
The board has kept us away because it knows that they are not going to say anything. They threw Shanta [Rangaswamy] out, they threw me out, now Shubhangi is out because Mr Pawar is not there.
All those who are pushing for women's cricket have been put on the back burner, so there is nobody to present the players' cases. The people who are in the committee at the moment are all "yes girls". How many meetings does the BCCI women's committee have? One in a year, just before the general body meeting. The next year, the committee changes.
Players should be getting the maximum. In women's cricket, it is the other way round. The selectors get the maximum, then come the match referees and then the players. So how are you going to get girls into cricket?
And what is the domestic match fee? Rs 2500. Where are you going to eat if you stay in a four-star hotel? The fee for T20 is Rs 1250.
When you have a World Cup shifted from a ground to accommodate a Ranji game, what does that say?
It is an absolute disgrace. And why are we having it [the World Cup] only in one centre? Promote it in the smaller areas. When we played in the late 1970s, in Patna, in Jamshedpur, we used to have 30,000 people watching. When we won the Test against West Indies, the scenes were unbelievable. Even at the Eden Gardens, in 1975, the pavilion side was packed with spectators. Maybe people came out of curiosity, but at least crowds came to see the match. Who is coming today?
I am happy with the advertisements that ESPN is doing now on women's cricket. Like: who is the first person to make an ODI double-hundred? It is a woman. Why is Sachin [Tendulkar] getting credit for the double-hundred? It has to be Belinda Clark [who made a double in 1997].
Now that the BCCI is running cricket, it shouldn't be that they should run only men's cricket. They should be happy with the women's cricket too.
Where are the photos of the women's team captains in the BCCI office? Why are there only photos of male cricketers? There was not a single ladies' toilet in the old BCCI office till I went and fought for it.
What about the one-time benefit? Srinivasan has just refused. What have we asked for? We are not asking to be paid at the same level as men's cricket. All we have asked is that women cricketers who have played between one and ten Test matches should get Rs 10 lakh (approximately US$18,000); those who have played between ten and 20 Tests can get Rs 20 lakh ($36,000).
But when Mr Srinivasan took over as president of the board, he said, "Why should we give you money? What have you all done?"
Mithali has said that India women's matches must be televised to create visibility. I may be boasting, but when I go to movies or restaurants, I am still recognised. But I am sure if Mithali is with me, she won't be recognised. It is sad. I still feel nice when someone comes up to me and introduces me to their children. Why shouldn't these girls get the recognition? Jhulan is a Padma Shri winner - she's an Arjuna awardee, so is Mithali. Why can't more articles be written about them?
"What is the domestic match fee? Rs 2500. Where are you going to eat if you stay in a four-star hotel?"
I guess the media also has to be blamed for failing to cover women's cricket adequately?
Yes. I have been after Arnab [Goswami], Rajdeep [Sardesai], Barkha [Dutt], especially for this one-time benefit. Even the National Commission for Women took it up. What happened? Nothing.
Look at the pension for women cricketers. We are getting Rs 15,000 as pension. Fair enough. But the pension is given only to cricketers who have played five Tests and more. Why? What about people who have played less than five Tests? Suddenly the ICC said some matches have been declared unofficial. Why? We played as India, we went abroad as India. The government gave a sanction for India. Just because the English or Australians said we sent an U-19 or an U-21 team? The International Women's Cricket Council did not recognise it, so the ICC did not, too. But did you take us or our board into confidence, asking: have you played official series? [Edulji is referring to three series between 1975 and the mid-80s, which included a tour by an Australian women's team to India in 1975 and a tour to England by the Indian women in 1981.] If a [male] domestic cricketer can get a pension, why not [a woman] who has played even one Test? They get Rs 5000. I cannot understand this logic at all.
What do you think motivates people like you, Jhulan, Mithali and the others to keep going?
It is just the love of the game, even in these circumstances. I was driving and on Marine Drive I saw this whole bunch of red t-shirts coming. I realised it was the India women's team. They were walking from the hotel to the Wankhede. I stopped my car, and the way they greeted me, I felt nice, but I also felt that this is the Indian national team, and they are walking on the street? And where are they playing? Police Gymkhana, Hindu Gymkhana, Bombay Gymkhana? Would any men cricketers play there?
When I went as the manager for the England tour in 2009, it was cold and we had no warm clothing. I rang up Nike and also informed BCCI that we would need jumpers. I was told, "It is not in the budget." I said, I don't care. That is the first time they got jumpers. I am told that, at times, they are even given used kits, left over by men. The sizes don't match, patches are put [to hide the names]. Is this the way you treat them? This mindset has to change.
I think the media has to have the guts, otherwise women's cricket will die in a few years. Tell me, where are the back-ups? Where are the U-19 players? I have asked for the Under-19 squad to be given at least one tour. Why will that player come on to the ground? She will pick up another sport, like hockey or squash.
How does a woman make a living out of cricket in these times of inflation?
She can't. Unless you really click, like Jhulan or Mithali. The only positive is the Railways. Players get a permanent job there. In spite of that, the board is anti-Railway. They won't let players get an NOC.
What is your match fee? How are you going to survive on it? At least in the Railways, players start with a minimum salary of Rs 15,000-Rs18,000, if they get a Group C job. They also get free medical care and free travel for life.
The Indian Railways is the lifeline of Indian women's cricket. Air India closed down once the BCCI came in, because they were not an affiliated unit. We were lucky we were affiliated, as we play Ranji. So Railways got an entry, while Air India did not. Services do not have a women's team. So it is just one organisation.
Sport is on the decline in the Railways too. Jobs are not easy to get.
What about the grassroots level? The Ministry is talking about the core group - those who are shining at Asian or Commonwealth level - so is the Railways. But where did they come up from? You have to give them the support at the grassroots for them to come up.
Belinda Clark, the first player in history to hit a double-century in ODIs, is now a part of Cricket Australia's Centre for Excellence © Getty Images
Enlarge
Are there any decent players on the horizon? What after Jhulan and Mithali go?
No, because there's hardly anything happening at the Under-19 and Under-16 levels. It just shows that they are not interested in letting it go further. Look at the set-up in Australia and England. It is so professional.
The ECB have arranged jobs as coaches for their women players…
Yes. And Belinda [Clark] is at Cricket Australia's Centre for Excellence. They are being respected, their achievements are being recognised.
Do you think the women's game can be made marketable?
Why not? Anything is marketable. During the IPL I was watching a game with Mr [Lalit] Modi and Mr Pawar and suggested that a five-over game for the women could be held, to promote women's cricket; an international team could come over; you could mix the Indian players with the internationals and have one match during the semi-finals and one during the final. What is wrong in that? You can do anything if you want to. But if you don't want to, then all sorts of excuses come forward.
Why is the Indian women's team not allowed to wear the Sahara logo? Why does the men's team wear the logo? Sahara pays the BCCI, a share comes to the men. It doesn't come down to the women. Sahara is the BCCI sponsor. It hasn't said, "Don't sponsor the women." Think about it.
1st Match, Group A: India Women v WI Women at Mumbai (BS)
Jan 31, 2013 (14:30 local | 09:00 GMT)
2nd Match, Group B: Aus Women v Pak Women at Cuttack
Feb 1, 2013 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT)
3rd Match, Group A: Eng Women v SL Women at Mumbai (BS)
Feb 1, 2013 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT)
4th Match, Group B: NZ Women v SA Women at Cuttack
Feb 1, 2013 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT)
5th Match, Group B: Aus Women v SA Women at Cuttack
Feb 3, 2013 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT)
6th Match, Group A: India Women v Eng Women at Mumbai (BS)
Feb 3, 2013 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT)
7th Match, Group B: NZ Women v Pak Women at Cuttack
Feb 3, 2013 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT)
8th Match, Group A: SL Women v WI Women at Mumbai
Feb 3, 2013 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT)
India are playing the tenth Women's World Cup, this one in home conditions, but apart from the weather their captain Mithali Raj does not believe being hosts grants them any particular advantage. India, who finished third in the 2009 edition, play their opening game against West Indies under lights at the Cricket Club of India on Wednesday.
West Indies finished fifth in 2009 in Australia "as underdogs", but have gained plenty of experience since then and are here to win this time, said their captain Merissa Aguilleira. West Indies have played 38 ODIs since the previous World Cup, only one behind England, who have played the most.
India have been restricted to 26 one-dayers in the same period and their previous ODI was as far back as July 2012. Raj said she would have liked to play more games, but was nevertheless satisfied with the side's preparation and their showing in the two practice matches.
"It depends on the board completely to give us a number of matches," Raj said. "As players, whatever amount of games we get to play before the World Cup, we try and make the best of it. As a player, I would definitely want to have more tournaments, more international games to play.
"We had the domestic season and after that we had two camps, one in NCA and the other one in Mumbai. We have prepared really hard and we get into the tournament will full preparation. But again we will take it one match at a time. I personally would not emphasise more on the results, I'd rather go with the process. If everything goes well, then … we might … do it."
Raj was expecting flat pitches which she felt would restrict India's home advantage to their experience of the weather. "It is going to be the humid conditions. During the practice games, we have had very flat wickets, and scores have been generally high. Basically, the ICC has provided batting tracks so that a lot of runs are scored in the tournament. We have had a camp in Mumbai so our players are used to the conditions. We are also used to slightly slower wickets.
"If it is a flat track, it is definitely not an advantage. In an ICC tournament everybody would want to see 300 on the board rather than 89 all out. I guess that is the reason, everybody around the world wants to prepare a batting track.
"I feel when it is a flat track, it could be anybody's game. There will be a lot of runs. The bowling needs to be tightened up. The crucial thing would be the fielding because the wicket will not change over both the innings."
Compared to previous World Cups, Raj felt India had a strong opening combination going into the tournament. "One thing I have always felt is that India never had a very good opening pair. That was a concern. This time we have Thirush Kamini who has made a comeback. In both the [practice] games, the openers [Kamini and Poonam Raut] have given us a good start.
"We do have the senior players Jhulan Goswami and Amita Sharma. We have the vice-captain Harmanpreet Kaur. We have two comeback players, Kamini and Karu Jain. I hope with this kind of combination we will do very well."
India lost the ODI series 2-1 on their Caribbean tour in early 2012. Raj said West Indies were a constantly developing side. "They have very talented players and some hard-hitters too. With Indian conditions, and I guess some of their players not keeping well, they are still to get acclimatized to the conditions, that might help us and also the kind of form we are in, I am sure the girls will put up a good show."
The experienced offspinner Anisa Mohammed had troubled the Indians in West Indies and Aguillera said her spinners would play a key role in India. "We are an all-round team. We have five spinners in the side and that has worked really well for us," Aguilleira said. "We'll make an impact with the compact side that we are.
"We went into the last World Cup as underdogs and lacked experience. But we've gained a lot of experience in the past four years and are not just taking part but competing this time."
West Indies were so tired after their trip from the Caribbean that they cancelled their second warm-up fixture following a heavy defeat to Australia Women in their first practice match. However, they are coming off a tied ODI series against South Africa at home and should not feel short of time in the middle. Aguilleira said the South Africa games had helped the side adapt to the new ODI rules which mandate a maximum of four fielders in the deep.
Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo
http://www.espncricinfo.com/inline/content/image/172418.jpg
India vs wi -- india 74/0 in 18 overs
India Women V/S West Indies - INDIA 137/0 (31.2 ov) KAMINI NOTOUT 66 (112) , RAUT NOTOUT 59 (86)
http://theinsightezine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ICC-Women-Cricket-World-Cup-2013-WWC-2013.png
India Women 160/0 (35.0 ov) PG Raut not out 71 90 7 0 78.88
MDT Kamini not out 74 122 8 0 60.65
India Women 284/6 (50.0 ov)
Thirush Kamini's maiden century led India to 284 for 6 against West Indies in their first Women's World Cup game in Mumbai
http://p.imgci.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/153900/153982.jpg
West Indies Women 179 (44.3 ov)
After a day's play on England's tours to Australia or New Zealand, Rachael Heyhoe-Flint would take the score sheets, go to her hotel, compose a match report and dictate it over the phone to the Daily Telegraph's office in London. Nothing out of the ordinary for a touring reporter in the 1960s and 70s. Except that Heyhoe-Flint was also England Women's captain. She knew that no publicity meant no sponsorship, and no sponsorship was bad for any sport, particularly one such as women's cricket, forever hamstrung by comparison to its male counterpart. But Heyhoe-Flint's toil bore fruit when businessman Jack Hayward helped sponsor the inaugural Women's World Cup in 1973, a couple of years before the men's event.
It has been forty years since then. The ICC-backed tenth edition of the Women's World Cup begins tomorrow in Mumbai - and later in Cuttack - when India take on West Indies under lights at the historic Brabourne Stadium. The game will be live on television. The teams are staying in a luxury landmark hotel, accompanied by a variety of support staff. Several journalists are chasing players for interviews. Forget 1973, even in the 1997 edition, held in India, the players themselves had to move the sightscreen. The world of women's cricket today is unrecognisable from Heyhoe-Flint's struggle to bring it some attention. Or is it?
'David Warner would have hit that one for six.' 'With such shortened boundaries, even I can hit more sixes.' 'Not one six so far in the game? How boring!' 'I would have stopped that four in my sleep.' These are some of the typical reactions from fans and even cricket journalists to the women's game. To one's mind, cricket has to be the only game where the women's side of the game is seen consistently through the prism of the men's version. Tennis never paid scant attention to Victoria Azarenka's Australian Open win because she didn't have to beat Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal or Novak Djokovic.
On the eve of India's tournament opener against West Indies, Mithali Raj, India Women's captain, was asked whether any of the senior Indian male players had given inputs and what difference would it make to her if any of them turned up to watch. Imagine MS Dhoni being asked the reverse.
Raj believes there is no escaping from the "comparisons" which "are bound to happen because we play the same sport." However, she reminds it is not exactly comparing apples to apples. "People should realise that at the end of the day, it is different sexes," Raj said. "And there is one big issue about physical ability. When it comes to the mind game or the technique, I think everybody would agree that we are on par with them. [The rest] is nature. We can't really do much about it." It is something people would do well to keep in mind over the next three weeks when changing channels in disappointment after watching a few deliveries of a women's game, because it doesn't confirm to what they have to come to believe, or have been led to believe, is "entertaining cricket".
Raj says the advent of Twenty20 and the Indian Premier League has further skewed the balance against women when it comes to perceptions. "The power point has come into the picture with the IPL. But otherwise if you see the one-dayers and the Tests I am sure earlier it was more of technique. Basically it is T20 which is more entertaining and when you see those soaring sixes… with the inception of T20, things have definitely changed."
Things haven't been too much better when it comes to administration. One of only two stadiums from where matches were to be broadcast on television, Wankhede Stadium, was lost to the local association's demand of having their team play the Ranji Trophy final there. As telling as the muted opposition to and criticism of the demand was the fact that it was actually made in the first place. Whoever heard of a marquee World Cup venue being lost to a domestic final? Not in the men's game anyway.
So what do these women have to offer us that we have so far refused to warm up to? "It is always curiosity that pulls people to come and watch women's cricket and when they do, they always acknowledge the elegance of the strokeplay and the kind of effort put in by the players," Raj says.
"I must admit I have seen some of the most amazing shots played by the West Indies players. I am sure you will get to see that during the tournament. They definitely match the men's standard."
"Deandra Dottin [who holds the record for the fastest T20I hundred, across the men's and women's games] would definitely clear the boundary," adds Charlotte Edwards, the England Women captain.
Since most of them can't resort to power like the men do, timing, and the resulting elegance, is a given in the women's game. Raj is one of the best examples of grace with a bat in hand. Because it is not easy to blast your way out of trouble, most women batsmen have very fine techniques. There is also cultured hitting that is making its way into the women's game, with the likes of Australia and England leading the way. Women spinners still actually flight the ball generously in one-dayers, and they are met with dancing batsmen who drive such deliveries through the covers with high elbows and full followthroughs. The fielders sprint and dive as well as their bodies allow them to.
Starting tomorrow, the cricketing world has another chance to watch all this, and appreciate it for what it is, women playing international cricket. And leave the comparisons with the men out.
Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo
England Women 238/8 (50 ov)
Sri Lanka Women 244/9 (50.0 ov)
आईसीसी वुमन्स वर्ल्ड कप क्रिकेट के ग्रुप ए के महत्वपूर्ण मुकाबले में आज टीम इंडिया का मुकाबला श्रीलंका से है। टीम इंडिया ने पहले गेंदबाजी करते हुए श्रीलंका को पहला झटका दिया है। झूलन ने जयनगनी को चार के स्कोर पर पवेलियन लौटा दिया। लंका ने 7 ओवर्स में एक विकेट पर 35 रन बना लिए हैं।
दोनों ही टीमों को सुपर सिक्स में पहुंचने के लिए न सिर्फ मैच जीतना जरूरी है बल्कि रन-रेट का भी ध्यान रखना है। इस महत्वपूर्ण मुकाबले में श्रीलंका ने टॉस जीत कर पहले बल्लेबाजी करने का निर्णय लिया है। भारतीय टीम में एक परिवर्तन के साथ मैदान में उतरी है। निरंजना के स्थान पर शुभलक्ष्मी शर्मा को टीम में शामिल किया गया है। वहीं श्रीलंका टीम में दो परिवर्तन किए गए हैं।
टीम इंडिया को पिछले मैच में इंग्लैंड के हाथों पराजय का सामना करना पड़ा था। वहीं श्रीलंका को वेस्टइंडीज ने करारी शिकस्त दी थी।
Sri Lanka Women 282/5 (50.0 ov) v/s india
आईसीसी वुमन्स वर्ल्ड कप क्रिकेट के ग्रुप ए के महत्वपूर्ण मुकाबले में टीम इंडिया को श्रीलंका ने 283 रन का लक्ष्य दिया है। लंका ने टॉस जीतकर पहले बल्लेबाजी करते हुए निर्धारित 50 ओवर्स में 5 विकेट पर 282 रन बनाए।
लंका के लिए दीपिका रसनगिका ने 84, यसोदा ने 54, कप्तान शशिकला ने 59 और इंग्लैंड के खिलाफ आखिरी गेंद पर छक्का लगा मैच जिताने वाली कौशल्या ने मात्र 31 गेंदों पर 56 रन की तेजतर्रार पारी खेली। टीम इंडिया के लिए झूलन गोस्वामी ने तीन व आरती शर्मा ने एक विकेट लिया।
दोनों ही टीमों को सुपर सिक्स में पहुंचने के लिए न सिर्फ मैच जीतना जरूरी है बल्कि रन-रेट का भी ध्यान रखना है।
टीम इंडिया को पिछले मैच में इंग्लैंड के हाथों पराजय का सामना करना पड़ा था। वहीं श्रीलंका को वेस्टइंडीज ने करारी शिकस्त दी थी। वहीं ग्रुप ए के एक अन्य मैच में इंग्लैंड ने वेस्टइंडीज को 6 विकेट से हराकर सुपर सिक्स में प्रवेश कर लिया है।
Sri Lanka Women 282/5 (50 ov)
India Women 117/6 (32.1 ov)
England's bowlers successfully defused West Indies' explosive batting line-up to set up a six-wicket win that puts the holders through to the Super Six stage. Anya Shrubsole claimed career-best figures before opener Danielle Wyatt hit 40 and victory with 15 overs to spare had the added effect of damaging West Indies' net run rate, which could help decide qualification from Group A.
Only two West Indies batsmen got into double figures - and there were six ducks - as they limped to 101 all out. Katherine Brunt removed Kycia Knight with the second ball of the match before her new-ball partner Shrubsole struck three times. The run-out of West Indies captain Merissa Aguilleira was followed by Brunt having Deandra Dottin caught behind, leaving the innings in tatters at 31 for 6.
Kyshona Knight, batting at No. 4, and Shanel Daley staved off complete disaster with a partnership of 58 but the introduction of Arran Brindle hastened the end of the innings. Brindle took 3 for 0 from two overs, having top-scorer Kyshona Knight stumped for 33, and Shrubsole returned to complete a four-wicket haul, with Daley unbeaten on 30.
In reply, Wyatt and Brindle put on 66 for the first wicket, as England appeared to be cruising into the Super Sixes. Dottin took two in two balls as four wickets fell for 13 runs but Heather Knight struck three boundaries to make sure Charlotte Edwards, England's captain who had been feeling unwell, did not have to bat. The only other flutter for England was caused by Brunt having to leave the field during West Indies' innings with a suspected twisted ankle.
Although West Indies had gone into their final group game with a healthy NRR of +1.040, it fell to +0.276 in defeat and they will have to wait on the result of India's match with Sri Lanka to determine whether they stay in the tournament.
Skipper Mithali Raj finally came good with an unbeaten century as Indian women beat arch-rivals Pakistan by six wickets in a seventh place play-off encounter in the ICC Women's World Cup in Cuttack on Thursday.
Already out of contention after being hammered by Sri Lanka, the 'Women in Blue' came up with a much improved performance as they first restricted Pakistan to 192 for seven in 50 overs and then reached the target in 46 overs at the Barabati Stadium.
Skipper Mithali, who had been in woefully out of form, helped herself back into form with an unbeaten 103 off 141 balls with the help of 13 boundaries and a six. The only regret she would have is that her best came when it mattered the least.
Mithali added 87 runs for the unbroken fifth-wicket stand with Reema Malhotra, who remained undefeated on 25. The Indian women were in a spot of bother at 108 for four but the Indian captain found an able ally in Malhotra as they comfortably won their last game of the tournament with consumate ease.
Mithali also enjoyed couple of useful stands of 43 and 49 with opener Thirush Kamini (26) and Harmanpreet Kaur (16).
Earlier, the decision to bat first after winning the toss didn't quite work for Pakistan, who were saved to a large extent due to the contrasting half-centuries from Nain Abidi (58) and Nida Dar (68 not out).
The Indians bowlers, led by the economical pace duo of Jhulan Goswami (2/17) and Nagarajan Niranjana (3/35), kept it tight for most part of the 50 overs.
The hosts, who were knocked out of the event after being stunned by minnows Sri Lanka in a must-win group match, were off to a perfect start when they sent back the Pakistani openers with just 28 runs on the board in 11 overs.
But Abidi steadied the rocking boat by forging a small 32-run partnership with Bimah Maroof (15). Then came the crucial 80-run stand with Dar, which brought Pakistan back into the match.
Dar was the more aggressive of the two batters, striking seven fours in her 83-ball knock.
Abidi faced 113 balls and struck five fours before being out caught by Thirush Kamini off Goswami's bowling. After the settled partnership was broken, Pakistan could not accelerate in the closing stages faced with a disciplined Indian attack.
For India, Ekta Bisht also chipped in with a wicket even though she was tad expensive, conceding 50 runs in her nine overs.
Story first published on: Thursday, 07 February 2013 13:10
Five-time champions Australia have entered the final of the ICC Women's World Cup after thrashing Sri Lanka by nine wickets in their second Super Six match at the Brabourne Stadium in Mumbai on Sunday.
In reply to Sri Lanka's paltry 131, Australia chased down the target in just 22.2 overs. This was Australia's fifth successive victory in the tournament.
In contrast to the Sri Lankans, who took 206 deliveries to reach the three-digit mark, Australia scored at slightly faster pace than run-a-ball to get to 100 in only 96 balls.
Openers Meg Lanning and Rachael Haynes provided a solid platform as the duo stitched a 55-run partnership.
Haynes scored an unbeaten 71 off 61 balls laced with nine fours and two sixes, while Lanning hit a 36-ball 37 studded with six fours and a six.
Prasadini Weerakkody was the only Lankan bowler to have picked up a wicket, getting rid of Lanning.
Earlier, put in to bat, Sri Lanka started on a disastrous note to be reeling at 41 for four before they eventually got all out for 131 in 45.2 overs.
Aussie off-spinner Erin Osborne was the pick of the bowlers, scalping three for nine from her 10 overs.
Incidentally this was Sri Lanka's highest score against Australia, as they were earlier bundled out for 82 in 2000 and 57 in 2005.
One-down batter, Deepika Rasangika (43) anchored the innings to an extent and shared a 49-run stand with wicketkeeper-batter Dilani Manodara (21) to steer the team past 100-run mark.
Australia's pace attack exploited the conditions well as Megan Schutt, Julie Hunter and Holly Ferling picked up wicket apiece at the start.
Australia were without the services of pace spearhead Ellyse Perry, who aggravated an ankle injury.
Cricket Australia Physiotherapist Claire Stokes in a statement said, "Perry has suffered an exacerbation of a pre-existing ankle impingement injury. At this stage we expect her to be fit for the next match against the West Indies."
After losing Yashoda Mendis (0), Chamari Athapaththu (10), skipper Shashikala Siriwardene (2) and Sandamali Dolawatta (4) within the first 16 overs, Sri Lanka crawled their way back for a brief period.
The left-hander Rasangika batted patiently in the able company of Manodara and the duo steadied the innings to some extent.
Rasangika struck seven fours in her 77-ball innings before she was caught at extra cover by Lisa Sthalekar.
Sri Lanka suffered another blow when they lost the set Manodara at the same score of 90. Osborne, who dismissed Manodara, struck in her next over to dismiss the dangerous Eshani Kaushalaya Lokusooriya for a duck.
The Sri Lankan tail wagged a bit to prolong the innings and the last three batters managed to add 23 runs.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.